Of the planet’s
7,500 million, about one-thirty-seventh of one percent of one percent come from
in or around Ferguson, Missouri, which saw massive riots six years ago as a
result of police killing a black man. Only about a quarter of a percent of a percent
come from in or around South Minneapolis, whic h saw the same thing happen a
few weeks ago. I’m probably not the only person who has lived in both
neighbourhoods, but I think I’m one of the few.
Twice now
I’ve been in another country, watching violence break out in peaceful neighbourhoods I knew well.
Twice now I’ve had to call friends or family to make sure they’re not in the
middle of it. And most people I know – already stressed because of the
pandemic, the quarantine and the sudden blow to the economy – are feeling anger
and despair like they’ve never felt before.
So I want
to speak carefully on this; of course I’m not there on the ground right now,
and I’m not black, and I don’t pretend to speak for anyone else. But twice now
I’ve received reports from friends and family on the ground as it happened, and
it might not seem like it, but I think there’s a lot of good news here.
Virtually everyone is united on this. I check out multiple news sources
– what are considered far-left, far-right, and mostly people who go beyond the
stereotypes of the political spectrum. Everyone agrees these police were
terrible, and everyone is celebrating that they are going to prison. Think of
any other issue that has so many people agreeing.
You got things done. In a lot of times and places people
might have looked the other way or been afraid to speak up, and that’s still
the case across much of the world today. But here, as a result of the massive and immediate public outcry, these
officers were fired almost immediately, charged swiftly, and are now in jail. I
used to be part of the Minneapolis political scene, I can tell you that this response
happened because people there are so politically active, and so prepared to
take action. The famously scrappy French labour movement doesn’t have so many
strikes and marches because conditions there are worse; rather, conditions
there are better because they take to the streets.
The media is getting better. I’m seeing a lot of news outlets
point out something very important, something that should have been talked
about in Ferguson; the rioters are not the protesters. I knew some of the Ferguson
protesters; they were locals. The Ferguson police were locals. But some of the
rioters came from thousands of kilometres away. As a former newspaper reporter
I was incensed by the news coverage, which neglected to make this the lead
story, or ask questions about where these people came from.
I heard stories of protesters helping police protect businesses from rioters ... but most journalists didn’t make those important distinctions. In Minneapolis, I’m seeing news agencies make those distinctions. Business Insider – not a radical publication -- has run articles about this. That’s important.
I heard stories of protesters helping police protect businesses from rioters ... but most journalists didn’t make those important distinctions. In Minneapolis, I’m seeing news agencies make those distinctions. Business Insider – not a radical publication -- has run articles about this. That’s important.
We don’t see most of the good people are doing. For every tragedy highlighted by
social media, there are tens of thousands of people not just protesting, but
babysitting kids, looking after each other, helping clean up, donating to bring
back the businesses that were destroyed, all volunteers. This is what happens
in a crisis; people pull together. They won’t be on the news, but they are, in
their own way, heroes.
Many cops are good. In a recent survey most Americans
believed that a police officer fires their gun in the line of duty at least
once, and 30% guessed they shoot someone a few times a year. In fact, it’s the
opposite; three-quarters of US police have never fired a gun once in their
careers. I’m not implying that shooting their gun is always bad, or that they
can’t do wrong even without shooting – that negligent police officer didn’t
need a gun to kill George Floyd. My point is that almost all the time, police defuse
life-and-death situations peacefully.
If officers defuse violent situations, say, once a week – and for some it’s every day – that’s 200 violent situations over a career, and I don’t mean that 75% of those are defused without shooting. I’m saying that for 75% of officers, 100% were defused peacefully.
That doesn’t make the exceptions okay, or imply that there’s no problem with police in America. It does mean that police aren’t all one thing. A lot of news coverage depicts conflicts of police vs African-Americans, but it’s important to note that nine of ten African-Americans oppose even cutting the number of police, almost half rate their local police highly, and of course a lot of police – a third in my native St. Louis – are black themselves.
If officers defuse violent situations, say, once a week – and for some it’s every day – that’s 200 violent situations over a career, and I don’t mean that 75% of those are defused without shooting. I’m saying that for 75% of officers, 100% were defused peacefully.
That doesn’t make the exceptions okay, or imply that there’s no problem with police in America. It does mean that police aren’t all one thing. A lot of news coverage depicts conflicts of police vs African-Americans, but it’s important to note that nine of ten African-Americans oppose even cutting the number of police, almost half rate their local police highly, and of course a lot of police – a third in my native St. Louis – are black themselves.
That said,
there are a few other things to remember:
Police are civillians. As more of our social fabric has broken down,
as I hear more people talk about their neighbours with fear and loathing, we
put more of a burden on police to take care of neighbourhood disputes, mental
health crises, and all kinds of issues that aren’t their job.
Some activists are talking about “de-funding police,” which if they mean getting rid of all police, is idiotic. But in fairness, what a lot of them mean are taking some of the burden off police and passing it to people trained in family disputes, mental health, and so on. Depending on how it’s done, that has possibilities.
Some activists are talking about “de-funding police,” which if they mean getting rid of all police, is idiotic. But in fairness, what a lot of them mean are taking some of the burden off police and passing it to people trained in family disputes, mental health, and so on. Depending on how it’s done, that has possibilities.
Most articles
I read from the USA talk about police vs. civilians, and no one – not even the
protesters I know – think this is strange. As far as I know, that’s not the
language that was used in the USA decades ago, or in most Western countries
today. Police are civilians. I cannot stress how important this is. If you think
of them as soldiers, what country are they occupying, and what enemy are they
fighting?
Anger makes you vulnerable. I keep seeing memes passed around
that people should get angry. Anger is easy. I were one of the people in power,
I’d want people to get angry; angry people are easier to manipulate.
How many
Americans would have accepted their government launching a war in the Middle
East, had they not witnessed the middle of their greatest city levelled by a
terrorist attack? The US government wasn’t attacking a country that was behind
the 9-11 attacks, but it was difficult to say that at the time to people so
filled with anger, however justifiable. If you want to defuse a situation, you calm
people down enough to listen to the better angels of their nature. Angry people
do stupid things that get everyone hurt.
Don’t pick a side. I see a lot of slogans about how everyone
needs to pick a side, you’re either with us or you’re against us. I’ve heard
that before, both in my own life and in history, and that’s when things really
go south.
I hear more and more people talk gleefully about shutting down anyone who says anything they don’t like. But that’s not how people learn. That’s how civilisation breaks down.
I hear more and more people talk about doing anything to defeat hatred. But hatred is always other people; it’s never you.
I hear more and more people talk gleefully about shutting down anyone who says anything they don’t like. But that’s not how people learn. That’s how civilisation breaks down.
I hear more and more people talk about doing anything to defeat hatred. But hatred is always other people; it’s never you.
This could get a lot worse. I see a lot of memes about how the
people need to rise up, for they have nothing to lose. If you live in a modern
Western country with ample food, relative safety, and some vestigal trappings
of democracy, you have a lot to lose. Again, in movies like V for Vendetta or
the Hunger Games, riots and insurrection are how you take down an authoritarian
rule. In real life, they’re how you start authoritarian rule. And remember that
these memes are started and spread by people with an agenda, some of whom might
gain from violence breaking out.
Beneficial
movements in the past succeeded, not by lashing out in anger, but by talking
with neighbours, listening to each other, pooling resources, creating a logical
plan, and negotiating practical solutions. The marching down the street? That’s
the one percent that was filmed – most of it was behind the scenes, done by
people you’ve never heard of. And things got better. It can happen again.