A few decades ago “alternative” medicines mainly came
from “head shops” and other fringe outlets that catered to the then-marginal
counterculture. Today every health food store, pharmacist and supermarket sells
a range of “natural” pills, juices, salves, teas and powders that promise to
cure your cold, detoxify your body, sleep soundly, stave off illness, brighten
your mood, remember your anniversary and return to the size you were when you
were a teenager. Advertisements tout nutritionists, homeopaths, herbalists and
therapists of all kinds to read your chi, your chakras or some other kind of
pseudo-spiritual “energy.” In short, our poor health and dissatisfaction has
created whole new fields of capitalism.
It’s not difficult to see why; we’re getting sicker
across the industrialised world, perhaps most in my native USA, where more than
a third of the population is obese, and another third is overweight. Chronic
illnesses like heart disease, cancer, strokes and diabetes have created
skyrocketing medical costs – up 58 per cent in just nine years, according to
one study.
We can easily think of many reasons for this. For one
thing, most Westerners are surrounded by cheap and unhealthy food. An
increasing number of my own countrymen live in “food deserts”—especially,
ironically in farmland -- where junk food is the only thing available for many
miles. Most of us in the West live sedentary lives at work and home, working
longer and more stressful hours in this declining economy, and have less to
show for it. Moreover, that post-World-War-II Baby Boom is now entering pension
age, so a disproportionate percentage of the population is getting much sicker.
So we need doctors more, and can afford them less.
Even those Westerners who can afford treatment don’t
always get it; the number of parents who refuse to give their children
vaccinations, for example, increased by 77 per cent from 2003 to 2008. Part of
this might be because modern medicine has done its job so well, wiping out
almost all major diseases in a mere century; if you’ve never heard of anyone
getting polio, tuberculosis or measles, you might not be motivated to protect
yourself against them. We have quickly forgotten what it was like many generations
ago, when most children did not survive into adulthood and everyone knew
someone who died or were crippled by these diseases.
Part of it, however, might stem from an increasing
scepticism of a medical establishment that seems so distant and costs so much,
the same sentiment that makes pharmaceutical companies a reliable villain in
Hollywood movies. Americans in particular must pay exorbitant rates for
prescription drugs, so the companies charging such rates turn to other options.
Unsurprisingly, then, more people spend money on alternative therapies --
Americans spent almost $15 billion on herbal pills, a third as much as was
spent on conventional pharmaceuticals.
If you think that medicine, like all aspects of modern
society, will face a crisis in the coming decades, you might be inclined to cut
alternative medicine some slack. If our fuel, economic and climate crises
deepen, won’t fewer of us be able to afford CAT scans and chemotherapy, even if
hospitals still have them or the electricity to power them? Or if we value a more traditional way of life,
shouldn’t we be exploring more traditional cures, and rediscover how to heal
ourselves with a field of wildflowers?
Let’s get a few things straight. Firstly, words like
“alternative” or “natural” cover a lot of ground, and will encompass methods
that work and those that don’t. All foods affect the body – they’re food – and
some have long-noticed effects beyond mere nutrition; dandelions, for example,
are famous diuretics, as their colloquial name “piss-a-bed” suggests.
Almost all humans in history knew a great deal about the
plants all around them from the time they were children, and knew them as
intimately as we do the sexual lives of celebrities. We would do well to
rediscover that knowledge, and tend to our own health as much as we can before
having to see a doctor. We can probably do more by simply eating well,
exercising and spending time with loved ones, however, than we can by eating
herbs once we get sick.
As much local knowledge as those practitioners of herbal
medicine had, they lived only to about 40 years on average, until science
brought microscopes, trial and error and peer review into the medical world in
the 19th century. Few ancient skeletons appear older than that, whether
Neanderthals from 100,000 years ago or bodies preserved in Irish bogs from
2,000 years ago. Even a century ago in the wealthy European nations, most
people died before they were 50. Herbal wisdom could do some good, but it was
no substitute for clean water and sterilisation.
Secondly, most herbal medicines that actually work were
isolated chemically long ago and sold in pure form – aspirin, for example, from
willow bark. We still use them, but have stopped calling them herbal medicine.
In order to become medicine, however, they had to stand up to scientific tests,
and that’s where most alternative therapies fall apart.
If we are less likely to be able to afford conventional
medicine in the future, we might want to know what plants work as a backup; for
example, to boil willow bark to make a headache cure. This should be backup
knowledge for an emergency, though, for sterilised and standardised amounts are
surely preferable to unknown amounts.
Thirdly, companies have an interest in patenting and
selling cures that work, and pharmaceutical companies must follow public law to
prove their products work. If such companies could spare themselves the trouble
of manufacturing antidepressants and just patent an herb instead, they would
save themselves money. The herbal cures that work were patented long ago; if an
herbal cure has never been patented to make a profit, it probably doesn’t work.
A landmark ten-year study by the US National Centre for
Complementary and Alternative Medicine tested a wide variety of common herbal
cures and found that none of them performed any better than sugar-pill placebos
at alleviating the conditions they were supposed to cure. Specifically:
- Gingko had no effect on memory.
- Saw palmetto did nothing for prostate problems.
- Shark cartilage was useless against cancer.
- Black cohosh was useless for menopausal hot flashes.
- Echinacea, at least in their experiments, did not help with colds.
Fourthly, alternative medicine is an industry, just like
the mainstream pharmaceutical industry, run by executives in suits, making
pills in mechanised factories. Their packaging might have pictures of sunbeams
and rainforests, but they were made by corporations just like conventional
remedies; the only difference is that the alternative medicine market, in many
countries, doesn’t have to follow as many rules about what’s in their products.
This is one of the most important things to take away: Most herbal pills don’t necessarily contain
any of the substance they advertise on the package. A 2005 study published
in the American Journal of Medicine found “high content variability” in herbal
pills sold, with most companies not even testing how much gingko, say, is in
the gingko pills.
A 2003 study published in the Archives of Internal
Medicine found that only half the Echinacea pills purchased contained the
amount they were supposed to, and 10 per cent contained no Echinacea
whatsoever.
In addition, remember that “holistic” medicines don’t
just come from Chinese monks or Amazonian Indians; “holistic” refers to the
idea that the body has essential elements that need to be kept in balance, like
yin and yang in Chinese medicine or chakras in India. Western tradition has the
four humours, used from Polybus in the fifth century BC to the beginning of the
19th century AD, and which we still invoke when we refer to someone as
melancholy or sanguine.
Western writers came up with some creative cures using
this method – when 11th-century Arabic physician Ibn Butlan saw a
patient who felt cold and clammy, for example, he recommended eating a rooster,
an animal that was hot and dry. It might sound ridiculous, but all other
holistic medicines work on the same principle.
Holistic theory was used because no one really understood
how the body worked. Why did humours continue to be invoked for 2,400 years if
their recommendations were so ridiculous -- she-goat urine poured into the ears
for a stiff neck, to use an example from Pliny the Elder? Perhaps for the same
reason many modern alternative medicines appear to work; people use them to
treat problems like a cold or injury that eventually get better on their own
anyway, leading the patient to think that the prescribed remedy was
responsible. In cases where a patient gets measurably worse, perhaps, a certain
anthropic principle comes into play; those patients who die aren’t around to
complain that the cures didn’t work. Or – again, like modern alternative
therapies – they treated symptoms that are particularly hard to measure, like
“fatigue.”
If someone were to open a storefront today selling
she-goat urine or literal snake oil, though, they would get few customers and
might be shut down by the authorities. Nor, if your appendix bursts in China,
will surgeons give you such treatments – they have modern medicine and
pharmaceuticals, and use them. Why, then, do these now-disproven folk cures
thrive in countries far removed from their origin?
I suspect that the reason has little to do with the
medicines themselves, and everything to do with the Sixties counterculture,
where most of the alternative medicines were first popularised. Countercultural
types harshly criticised anything mainstream, modern, or Western – and
criticism is often healthy. The problem was that they suspended such judgement
for anything from Native Americans, Chinese, Africans or any other
culture.
Simply because we are willing to respect or explore a
foreign culture does not mean we have to suspend the burden of proof. If the
Chinese had been the civilisation to break out first and conquer the world, I
would have hoped they would have treated the Beatitudes with the respect they
deserve, but I would hope they would test Pliny and find that his cures don’t
work.
Modern medicine works because researchers came up with a
theory based on what they know, they tested various techniques and substances
in laboratories, then on animals, and finally on humans, and made sure their
findings were peer-reviewed before going out to the world. That is science, and
the fact that most of us are still alive testifies to the fact that it works.
That, ultimately, is why this issue is important, and is about more than
alternative medicine.
*****
Many people are rightly disgusted at our modern consumer
culture for one reason or another, although different groups have fixated on
different aspects of it. My more devoutly Christian friends in the USA mourn
the loss of traditional, close-knit families and safe communities, while rural
acquaintances have watched their towns slowly die as everyone drives to
Wal-Mart. My more ecological friends grieve for the loss of so much of the
natural world. My more countercultural friends dislike living at the non-existent
mercy of global corporations.
These groups seem to be at radically different political
and religious poles, yet they all have some things in common. Most of these
subcultures – American libertarians, evangelical Christians, anti-corporate
activism, alternative medicine enthusiasts and the environmental movement – all
originated in their modern form from the Sixties counterculture. And most of
them work selflessly and industriously in ways that are counter-productive,
that not only don’t help their cause but worsen the situation they set out to
help.
Again, it’s easy to see why: Like many people unhappy with
modern consumer culture, they want to return to the simplicity of an earlier
age. Yet they must live in modern culture – like most of us, they have families
and careers, commutes and mortgages. Few can simply abandon their lives and
take up farming, and those that try often discover that they don’t have the
self-sufficient skills of our forebears, nor are they accustomed to isolated
and long hours of physical labour. Many people, struggling in this economy,
could live more self-sufficiently at home and try to have the best of both
worlds, but that solution does not appeal to the all-or-nothing thinking that
is so popular these days.
So most people I know, in one way or another, yearn for a
simpler and more natural way of life, a way to get around big government and
big corporations and deal with authentic people, to buy products whose
ingredients they can pronounce. And so markets and movements have arisen to meet
that demand, and give people the illusion of doing that.
Most conservative Christians I know have worked,
selflessly and industriously, for issues and candidates that do not make families
closer or restore communities; getting the Ten Commandments put up in
courthouses, for example, will not get fathers to spend more time with their
sons. When I reported from small towns, most of the townspeople were fighting
their towns’ decay in ways that would only harm their populations; getting some
kind of gambling casino, for example, might help some people get jobs in the
short term, but will make the community poorer in the long term.
Many ecologically-minded friends, likewise, rally around
actions that have no effect. Some of these are harmless – turning off the
lights for an hour won’t save the world any fossil fuels, but it won’t waste
any more. Others might or might not do some good, depending on circumstances;
how much fuel do you spend driving your plastic bottles to the recycling
centre, for example, or would you be better off just re-using them at home?
Some of the ways people try to live a more natural life,
however, just do harm. Refusing vaccinations does not restore the collapsing
plankton levels in the ocean, it just makes your children more vulnerable to
disease. Buying “herbal” medicines sends money to corporations – just
corporations that can work outside of mainstream medicine’s public rules, and
so get to sell things that don’t work.
I'm neither a doctor nor a politician, but I can think of a number of ways people can improve their and their neighbours' health. They could persuade many people to garden, getting excercise and fresh vegetables. They could persuade lawmakers to force herbal companies to abide by the same standards as pharmaceutical companies. Americans, with their more complicated and expensive health care, could create a community health fund like the ones Oddfellows or Masons used to have, or that the Ithaca Fund has now: people pay a small amount into a fund to pay for the amount not covered in their insurance deductible, thus allowing them to have cheap health insurance with a high deductible. Americans could also persuade lawmakers to change health-care laws, imitating what seems to work best in other parts of the world.
I'm neither a doctor nor a politician, but I can think of a number of ways people can improve their and their neighbours' health. They could persuade many people to garden, getting excercise and fresh vegetables. They could persuade lawmakers to force herbal companies to abide by the same standards as pharmaceutical companies. Americans, with their more complicated and expensive health care, could create a community health fund like the ones Oddfellows or Masons used to have, or that the Ithaca Fund has now: people pay a small amount into a fund to pay for the amount not covered in their insurance deductible, thus allowing them to have cheap health insurance with a high deductible. Americans could also persuade lawmakers to change health-care laws, imitating what seems to work best in other parts of the world.
If more people feel sick, stressed
and helpless in years to come, however, the danger is that, instead of doing any of these real things, they will be a prime target for hucksters
selling placebos – things that only make them think they are fighting the good
fight.
Photos:
Chinese medicine - seahorses.
Nineteenth-century medicines.
Nineteenth-century advertisement.
Chinese medicine - deer penis.
Nineteenth-century advertisement for tansy pills.
All photos courtesy of Wikicommons.
References:
Photos:
Chinese medicine - seahorses.
Nineteenth-century medicines.
Nineteenth-century advertisement.
Chinese medicine - deer penis.
Nineteenth-century advertisement for tansy pills.
All photos courtesy of Wikicommons.
References:
More than a third of all Americans are obese, and more
than another third are overweight: Prevalence
of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults: United States, Trends
1960–1962 Through 2007–2008
The number is projected to increase by more than one
percent per year by 2030, resulting in an estimated chronically ill population
of 171 million: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation & Partnership for Solutions.
"Chronic
Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care." Johns Hopkins
University, Baltimore, MD (September 2004 Update).
Chronic illnesses cause about 70% of deaths in the US and
in 2002 chronic conditions (heart disease, cancers, stroke, chronic respiratory
diseases, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and kidney diseases) were 6 of the top
ten causes of mortality in the general US population: National Center for
Health Statistics. “ Health, United States” / 2004.
Amount of herbal substance in herbal supplements: “Lack
of herbal supplement characterization in published randomized controlled
trials,” American Journal of Medicine, Oct. 2005.
Ancient lifespans: http://www.wonderquest.com/LifeSpan.htm
39 percent of parents refused or delayed vaccinations:
according to the study by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, the
University of Rochester and the National Opinion Research Center.
The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the
United States: http://nccam.nih.gov/news/camstats/2007/camsurvey_fs1.htm
They don’t regulate whether there is any amount of the
disease in the pill: The American Journal of Medicine 2005 Oct;118(10):1087-93.
7 comments:
That's a big topic you've bitten off today, and I can think of a few responses I'd like to make. I'll limit myself to a traditional anthropological observation though. People resort to magic when they've reached the limit of what (they believe) they can do in the "real world". Azande potters knew all about working the clay and managing the temperature and so on, but still, sometimes the pot cracks in the heating. And to deal with that there is only magic or prayer. In your descriptions of healing and quackery, I see that dynamic. There are things we (believe we) can do or (we believe) modern medicine can do about our health and maladies. But maybe scientific medicine can't help us or we've lost our belief in it. Since "doing nothing (!)" isn't an option, we will inevitably do something that we're convinced will have an effect. And oddly enough, the human body seems to respond pretty positively to such a stratagem (e.g. the "placebo effect"), so the cycle gets reinforced.
In that part of the spectrum of human malady that responds to the placebo affect (and it is wider than most people realize), that's fine - and there I think is where much alternative medicine succeeds. Of course, scientific medicine has some pretty good mechanical cures that people are foolish to reject, and there are also serious mechanical problems that can crop up in the body that no amount or belief in quackery will cure.
To circle back to my Azande potters, I think my point (and I'm mostly through my third black and tan here, so be charitable) is that the trick is to keep track of the clay and the temperature before you resort to magic -- BUT, oddly enough the human body responds to magic in a way that the clay really doesn't. And for that reason I see the magic of alternative medicine as playing a more constructive role than most garden variety magic.
Where and when did *most* children did not survive into adulthood?
Andy,
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I agree that placebos can have a powerful effect, and I suspect this is why alternative medicines, prayer, magic rituals and faith healers seem to work, at least for a while. I think it’s important to make two ethical distinctions, though. Firstly: prayer and sugar pills cost you nothing, while faith healers and homeopaths are profitable enterprises.
Secondly: It’s one thing to pray for the sick because it’s the kind thing to do -- I’m told people do get better faster when they know people are praying for them, and it certainly won’t make the situation worse. That’s not the same, though, as faith healers or alternative therapies, however, in which people are told the intervention is literally eliminating the pathogen. The latter basically assures someone they don’t need to see a doctor anymore – which could cost them their lives.
Does that make sense? Feel free to write back.
Anonymous,
See, for example, “The History of Infant, Child and Adult Mortality in London, 1550-1850” in The London Journal, November 2007.
I don’t have any more sympathy than you for charlatans who dissuade people from effective healing. I just wanted to make an observation and maybe take the opportunity to sort out my own thinking on the topic.
There is a “mechanical” effect that physically operates on a physical problem (e.g. a chemical that causes veins to dilate, a bacteria the produces toxins in the tissues). There’s also the “psychological” effect that can affect the body physically (e.g. the placebo affect, psychosomatic ailments, toxic stress, the power of positive thinking, etc.). For thousands of years people have used both – coupling actual mechanical effects with all the “theater” of healing and quackery to strengthen, focus and direct the psychological effects. In my opinion a school of healing worthy of the name makes use of both of these. In truth, for its day to day success modern medicine relies both on mechanics and on the psychological effects (e.g. placebo effect) that comes from people’s faith in science and medicine. (This is probably one reason why doctors so long insisted on all the trappings of authority – and the more recent disdain for human psychology is one reason why despite their impressive arsenal of treatments, modern doctors so often fail at actual healing.) I think herbalism, massage, chiropractics, etc. also manage both aspects, the mechanical and the psychological. There are others, like homeopathy, crystals, faith healing, that (in my opinion) can only avail of the second – and that makes them much, much weaker in general and completely inappropriate for healing things beyond the body’s psychosomatic abilities.
I guess what I’m saying is that a crystal healer who cures someone’s tension headaches is doing good work, (indeed better than the M.D. with his pain pills) while a crystal healer who says they can replace chemotherapy is a dangerous quack who needs to be shut down. On the other hand, I think that a doctor who considers it enough to prescribe Lipitor for the suicidal American diet, isn’t much of a healer either.
Andy,
A fair point, although on the spectrum between the examples you give, where would you draw the line?
I wonder, based on what you've said, if one could measure the effectiveness of treatments when people had more faith in the treatment.
Brian,
I suppose I would draw the line at the traditional, "do no harm". That still leaves plenty of space for argument and discussion, however. Harm to the bank account is certainly a form of harm. And maybe leading people into superstition or misunderstanding of the world is a significant harm as well.
As for the science, there's a good rundown on some of the efforts to tease out what exactly is the placebo effect at skepdic. Sometimes the placebo effect just shows that people would've gotten better on their own (more or less regardless of whether the treatment was drugs or sugar pills) and sometimes the placebo seems to have actual physiological effects. In any case, I still think the whole mess of effects is integral to any effort to heal people, and healers have been sensitive to that fact for as far back as we can see.
A couple of comments. First, it's simply not true that most effective herbal medicines have been turned into pharma drugs. Most herbal medicines have multiple active ingredients, and many of those simply can't be turned into single-compound patentable pills with the same efficacy (much less safety). And the vast majority of non-Western plants have never been subjected to that type of study at all.
Second, the fact that people didn't know why things worked in the past doesn't prove that they were always delusional when they thought things did work. Those plants that you will admit to be effective because they have been turned into pharma drugs (e.g., aspirin, opioids) had their activities explained in terms of humors too. While the scientific method may (I say may) have been developed only in medieval Islamic society, "trial and error" is not something people were too mindless to do until recently; it is how people have always learned about their environment. How did the ancestors of today's Native Americans learn which plants could be used as food? By experimentation, no PhD needed.
And finally, many people fall victim to the claim that in the past, everyone died by 40 for the lack of modern allopathy. (The most imbecilic formulation I've seen claimed that the Romans died of old age at 20!) The main reason life expectancy was always so low, and still is so low in undeveloped countries, is that infant and young child mortality is horrific. Adults in the 30-40 range also ran a risk of dying from infectious disease, childbirth, or violence that we'd consider appalling today. But if you avoided those fates, you could indeed live to old age; quite a number of Romans made it to 70, 80, or even 100, and they were well familiar with the phenomenon of senile dementia. While allopathy has helped reduce the toll of infectious disease, with antibiotics and vaccinations, the biggest factor is public health measures such as clean water, clean food, and less crowded and polluted living space. No MD is required for the provision of those goods.
Post a Comment