Most people around the world have some legends about what
lies under the earth, and whatever it is – devils, dragons, spirits and
monsters of all kinds – it is almost always something to be avoided. We can
easily imagine how such stories began – for a thousand generations humans must
have come across volcanic fumes, exposed tar pits or other such hazards, and
concluded that what lies under the earth is meant to stay there.
In the last century or two, however, humans have gone the
opposite direction in a big way. Around the same time that scientists were
discovering all manner of useful metals, fossil fuels gave us the means to
extract them, and soon we were digging the biggest pits, the deepest holes, the
longest tunnels the world had ever seen. All this was, remember, to take what
were often extremely toxic materials --- our bodies did not evolve to cope with
lead, cadmium or mercury – put them in machines and compounds for humans to
use, and spread them throughout the places where humans lived. We're starting to suspect this wasn't a good idea.
One of these elements is lead, which last-century humans put into containers,
car parts, pipes, paints and many other products – and even in petroleum,
spreading lead-tainted exhaust across the world. Lead causes brain damage and
erratic behaviour if absorbed into the human body, and its rise and fall
correlates with the U.S. crime rate in the 20th century – the more lead was
around children, the more crime appeared a generation later. It’s been banned
from paints and auto fuel, of course, but it lingers on old buildings and in
soil.
Or take mercury: Burning coal releases it into air and
water, and thence into animals like fish – a 2009 study by the U.S. Geological
Survey tested 300 streams across the United States and found that every fish
tested contained mercury, a quarter at unsafe levels.
You could go on with a list of such heavy metals – cadmium,
zinc, copper – right down the periodic table. Most of all, we have pulled out
coal and oil and used it not just to fuel up the car and turn on the lights,
but to generate hundreds of thousands of petrochemicals with unpronounceable
names as long as sentences and often-unpleasant effects.
I say “we,” of course, but this isn’t a guilt trip; most of
this was before your time, and you didn’t vote for it anyway. You and I use
small amounts of heavy metals and fossil fuels in our own lives – driving,
flying, heating, buying plastic products, just looking at this on a computer –
but it’s very difficult to avoid doing so and still living in the modern world.
The consequence of so many people doing so many of these
things, though, is that any urban area – and many rural ones – will have
splotches on the map with large quantities of toxic materials in the ground. If
you live where a gasoline station used to be, or a factory, a garbage dump, or
any number of other things, you might have things in your soil you don’t want
in your stroganoff.
If you think you just won’t live in places, or just move
away from them, congratulations: You’re thinking the same thing as everyone
else. That presents a problem, as everyone who can live somewhere else will do
so, and everyone who can’t live somewhere else will live on contaminated sites.
Realistically, this means the poor, the elderly and other vulnerable people
have to live with everyone else’s toxic waste – which is often the case
already.
Other methods, like removing tonnes of contaminated soil,
involve years of work and vast sums of money we don’t have anymore. If you
could remove all the affected soil, moreover, where would you put it, aside
from somewhere else that would then be contaminated?
What we need is a device that can suck toxins out of the
soil and either turn them into something harmless, or concentrate them in
something removable. No one has much money lying around to invent such a
device, though, much less to manufacture millions of them and send them to
sites around the world for free. Thus, these hypothetical devices would be even
better if they already appeared around the world, or were lightweight and
easily transportable.
It would be best, in fact, if these machines cost nothing to
create, and once created could make more of themselves, at an exponential rate.
While we’re at it, it would also be nice if the devices also prevented soil
erosion, fed bees and other pollinators, and provided shade, beauty, a home for
wildlife, and possibly firewood.
Thankfully, we have these machines now. Certain plants, it
turns out, have a particular gift for sucking up specific chemicals, either as
a quirk of their biology or as a way to make themselves poisonous and avoid
being eaten. When these plants are sown on contaminated ground, they absorb the
contaminants into their tissues, gradually reducing the amount in the soil
until it is safe for humans.
Called phyto-remediation, this process has become one of the
newest and most promising fields of biology. Similar methods use mushrooms in
what is called myco-remediation, or use bacteria and have unfortunate names
like bio-sparging, bio-slurping and bio-venting, but we’ll restrict ourselves
here to plants.
The basic method is straightforward: Find out what toxins
lurk in your patch of ground, and come up with a regimen of plants appropriate
for the climate that hyper-accumulate those particular toxins.
“Toxins,” of course, covers a lot of ground, and the
vagueness of the word allows it to be used in all kinds of unproductive ways –
for example, every fake New Age cure that claims to rid your body of
unspecified “toxins.” So to get more specific, let’s separate toxins into two
of the most common categories: metals and petrochemicals.
Petrochemicals generally have familiar atoms like carbon,
hydrogen and oxygen, the same things that make up chocolate sundaes, flower
gardens, testosterone, newspaper, and most of the world around us. Those same
elements in different combinations, however, make common but un-tasty compounds
like gasoline, or lethal poisons like Agent Orange – it’s all in how many atoms
are put together in what arrangement.
If a plant can absorb, let’s say, the cancer-causing
benzo-pyrene – C20H12, found in coal tar – with some oxygen (O) and then
separate it into C12H22O11 and H2O, the petroleum-based poison would become
sugar water. I’m not saying this is the actual chemical process, by the way –
just an example of how chemical combinations can make something deadly or
delicious.
When the toxins are metals, of course, they cannot be broken
down into other elements any more than lead could be changed to gold. Some
plants can absorb the metal and metabolise it into some kind of molecule,
however, making it less easy to be absorbed by the human body and thus safer to
be around. Sometimes the metals can even help us; some biologists have even
proposed using certain edible plants to accumulate zinc from contaminated soils
and feeding the plants to people with a zinc deficiency.
After the plants are harvested with the metals concentrated
in their tissues, they can be burned, and the metal stays in the ash – a small
amount of space and weight to dispose of, compared to the tonnes of
contaminated earth. The ash might even be able to be mined for the metals, for
complete recycling.
Blue Sheep fescue helps clean up lead, as do water ferns and
members of the cabbage family. Smooth water hyssop takes up copper and mercury,
while water hyacinths suck up mercury, lead, cadmium, zinc, cesium,
strontium-90, uranium and various pesticides. Sunflowers slurp a wide range of
compounds – not just the uranium and strontium-90 from radioactive sites, but
also cesium, methyl bromide and many more. Perhaps the most magnificent hyperaccumulator, though, is
the simple willow tree, Salix viminalis; it slurps up copper, zinc,
cadmium, selenium, silver, chromium, uranium, petrochemicals and many others.
Also, once its biomass has concentrated the heavy metals, it can be harvested
and used for many practical things.
Of course, phytoremediation operates under certain
limitations; the plants have to be able to grow in that climate, and should not
be an invasive species that will take over the landscape, as kudzu did in the
American South. The plants can only remove toxins as deep as their roots, so
the technique might not solve groundwater contamination.
Most importantly, plants move at a different speed than we
do, and even after the plants are harvested they are not likely to have
eliminated the toxin. Reducing a toxin to safe levels takes time, and
phytoremediation doesn’t remove a problem overnight.

Perhaps the most appealing aspect of this new field, though,
is its scale, that the work to clean up toxic-waste sites could be done with no
massive government project or corporate funding, with no bulldozers or
construction equipment, without advanced and delicate technology beyond that to
measure the toxin levels. The principles could be taught to every schoolchild
or practiced by every land-owner, so that if anyone detects a certain toxin on
their property, they will know what to plant to gradually remove it. The seeds
and plants could be sold by any gardening or farm-supply store, so that some of
our society’s most grandiose mistakes can be fixed by ordinary people, using
natural means, using home-made experiments, hard work and patience, to restore
our land to what it once was.